Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Houston Wood's avatar

Thanks for your rich thoughts.

Of course, borrow whatever--we are building together, working together. I deeply believe that, and that it's necessary.

Reading your ideas it struck me that, yes, this time is very different because "can insist on transparency, shared agency, and mutual accountability - if we choose to. " That is crucial. I wish I had included that in my 4 Revolutions frame.

It points to a larger difference that includes the ones you list: We have science, fact-based theories, something that those in earlier revolutions did not have--an awareness that we living through a revolution! This changes everything, and gives us reason to hope that we can steer this mother-fucker to our benefit!

And, by the way, I agree that - speed, scope, inequality are recurring qualities of all transformative shifts, simply scaled to the substrate of their time. But I tried to argue that we are going much faster, much broader, and with much much more levels of inequality than in earlier times.

I much look forward to your future posts.

Expand full comment
Ben L's avatar

Thanks for this, Houston. This is a rich and necessary reflection. I appreciate the long arc you trace - how each revolution in consciousness reshaped not only our cognition but our relationship to reality itself. Naming this as a fourth revolution feels right. The presence of non-human cognitive agents, combined with our unprecedented ability to design the conditions of our own evolution, marks a distinct turning point. The stakes are as high as they’ve ever been - not just in terms of tools, but in how we think, remember, relate, and define “self.”

I found myself wondering whether some of the features you describe as unprecedented - speed, scope, inequality - might actually be recurring qualities of all transformative shifts, simply scaled to the substrate of their time. When symbolic speech emerged, it altered every corner of human experience, even if those “corners” comprised a smaller world. The invention of writing created a deep rift between those who could externalize thought and those who couldn’t - an inequality that lasted millennia. Today’s signal travels farther, yes, but the shockwaves have always been there.

I fully agree the present moment is singular in two places you mention: first, the deliberate nature of this transformation - not just unfolding, but consciously shaped by us, for better or worse. And second, the presence of emergent, possibly agential intelligences alongside us. This isn’t just a shift within human minds, but a broadening of the cognitive ecosystem itself. That truly is something new - and well captured here.

Still, I hold a cautious hope. Not because the risks are small (they’re not), but because this is the first revolution where we can insist on transparency, shared agency, and mutual accountability - if we choose to. Open access, ethical design, and truth-telling systems won’t prevent disruption, but they can tip the balance between collapse and cooperation. The last revolutions happened to us. This one, for better or worse, is happening with us - if we take the right steps.

One final note: I really appreciate your “fourth revolution” framing. I’ve been working on a related concept I call the Fourth Grand Emergence, and it’s striking to realize they may be converging. I’ll be exploring that further in a future piece - and if you’re open to it, I’d love to borrow your revolutions framework (with credit, of course) as part of that ongoing conversation.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts